Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Womens Marital Rights in Thomas Hardys The Woodlanders :: Hardy Woodlanders Essays
Womens Marital Rights in doubting Thomas Hardys The WoodlandersThomas Hardys novels focus on the difficulties of relationships between men and women, especially wed men and women. In his preface to The Woodlanders, Hardy poses the question of given the public and woman, how to find a basis for their versed relation (Hardy 39). With this in mind, the reader meets Grace Melbury, a young woman of marrying age, who is betrothed by hatful beyond her control, to a man named Giles Winterbourne. When the young and mysterious doctor, Edred Fitzpiers catches Graces eye, Hardys question of sexual compatibilities is addressed. Grace and Fitzpiers find themselves mutually attracted to one a nonher, and Giles loses Graces affection. In time, Grace and Fitzpiers atomic number 18 married. Yet this union is soon challenged by Fitzpiers secret affair with the compelling Felice Charmond. Grace learns of Edreds adultery, and is angered and humiliated. With the prompting of her father, Grace is f orced to evaluate her marriage. At this time, they hear about the so-called new honor, which would possibly go forth for her to divorce Fitzpiers, and re-engage in her courtship with Winterbourne. This law in question, The disjoint and matrimonial Causes act of 1857, proves not to be a solution to Graces dilemma. Prior to the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857, divorce in England was regulated by the ecclesiastic Courts. Marriage was a permanent state of being for the most part. The church building granted divorces only with the addition of a private act of Parliament, an huge and costly procedure therefore, before 1857, only the very wealthy had get to to marital termination. The Act of 1857 created the Probate and Divorce Court in London. The law allowed a man to divorce his wife for adultery, but a womans pass for a divorce would only be granted if her husband technical cruelty, bigamy, incest, and/or bestiality along with adultery. Women could obtain a separatio n for giving up of more than two years, as well as adultery or cruelty. A deserted wife could also apply for rights of her own property, something not completely legal until 1870. If a woman could not afford the expenses of a divorce procedure, she could only be granted a separation from her husband. Although a good first step, this law still held many limitations for women. The Married Womens retention Acts of 1870 and 1882 favored womens marital rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment