No Lift Policy

The given scenario has provided a clear perspective to the correct attitude and compliance ability of the holds to the no lift policy of The Area of health Services. The ill has a certain gravity of issue to address only if analyzing the situation further whitethorn lead to a conclusive forward motion whether the nurses bind actually done the right thing or not. The no lift policy was designed to prevent and reduce nurses injuries when lifting or lamentable diligents (Morieson, 2000).As stated in the complaint of the congenator, Mrs. McDonald was forced to lift herself up in bed. This phrase may lead to a conclusion that the tolerant is actually capable of doing the act without any assistance from the nursing cater. She is at least alive(predicate) of her capability to do a minimal mathematical operation by herself. Although the core service for a nurse is to provide assistance, in that respect are some restrictions that are implemented to benefit both the ply and the patient. Apparently, there is a motion on the nursing profession that provides a chance for the patients to be more independent.This will eventually permit the individualist to carry his tasks for self fulfillment. The complaint also stated that the two nurses were preoccupied of the patient. This may seem to be the case for the relative but the staff actually had the good attitude of complying with the regulations of the no lift policy. They have provided a rather complementary act by protecting their own health as well as giving opportunities for Mrs. McDonald to eventually start rehabilitating herself.As a matter of fact, if they had neglected the no lift policy ripe to satisfy the relatives impressions, they might have been subject to a very high risk of injury. This is one good example on how competent a nurse can be. A professional acts in accordance with own competency level and recognized standards of enrolled nursing radiation diagram (ANMC).There is another considerati on that should be realized regarding the nurses manner in the situation. They have attempted to assist Mrs. McDonald in the most effective management by helping her climb up in bed without lifting her. The patient was able to receive sustainable assistance by guiding her carcass and gently holding her up to the correct position. This somehow shows that the nurses were still aware what was happening and that made them consider implementing the correct nursing practice enveloped in the nursing practice policy.In a bigger picture, the nurses did the most allow approach by not lifting Mrs. McDonald. They were just following a simple rule for the benefit of both parties involved, the patient and themselves. However, the submission of a complaint could have been avoided if there was a complete transparent communication amongst the nurse and the relative.As stated in the nurse code of ethics, the nurse has a responsibility to avow people about the nursing thrill that is available to them, and people are entitled morally to accept or reject such care (ANMC, 1993). In this case, it would have been ideal to inform the relative about the no lift policy for mutual understanding. Moreover, the nurses should have at least questioned Mrs. McDonald if she actually is capable to lift herselfindependently. This affirmation may have provided a different perception on the side of the relative since it is the patients own judgment about her capability that is of abundant importance. The complete cooperation of Mrs. McDonald and the nurses should have been the most effective factor to avoid this potpourri of complaint scenario.ReferencesANMC. 1993. Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia. Australian Nursing and tocology Council. Retrieved may 18, 2007 from http//www.anmc.org.au/docs/ANMC_Professional_Conduct.pdf.ANMC. National Competency Standards for the Enrolled Nurse. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http//www.cshisc.com.au/docs/upl oad/ANMC%20competencies%20for%20the%20Enrolled%20Nurse.pdf.Morieson, B. 2000. Australian Nursing Federation. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http//www.anfvic.asn.au/media_releases/010622.html.